It takes some of the oddities of our day, for it to be, if you look at a book would like to express, explicitly have to stress that one has actually read it. Thilo Sarrazin page book, "Germany abolishes itself" is no longer a quite the contrary. The top representatives of our state, President and Chancellor, were at before the launch of the book first September agreed that one does not need to read. A few excerpts, Mrs Merkel to determine that Sarrazin's new book "not helpful" and "defamatory", and Wulff called before publication of the book, the Bundesbank to "damage control" on and thus had very clearly indicated to dismiss his opinion immediately Sarrazin was. Then you could - you remember? the time is so fast-moving, that was before Stuttgart 21 and before the Castor transport! - Heard from countless politicians, the matching chorus of indignation and flight in the arts pages of national newspapers (FAZ, SZ, taz - here only one example), read how one expert review of a sociologist, a biologist, a political scientist Sarrazin's the link between education and research "biologism" outrageous nonsense as a result and is exposed directly to National Socialism (+ + +) was performed. I almost said: The pious reader thinks ... :-)
I do not know who has read all of his loud and strong critics read his book really seems Professor Wehler , and perhaps Herwig Birg (quoted from the focus ), because the two have very expressed much more restrained and factual. The book by Thilo Sarrazin has it all, if you read it thoroughly. There are not only the many figures and tables that are complaining, but are only just evidence of his opinion, there are more references to literature, scientific research, sources, etc. But if his comments at least will take note of is reading very tiring and tedious even for a fast reader - from the Inspecting himself to mention.
For you to think it will, however, excited at having read his book very much, and that is in view of his subject very well before. Thilo Sarrazin yes because it is not "just" foreigners and integration, he's in the long chapters of the book, rather, a fact-rich representation of the economic and social situation of the Hartz IV - receiver and a political assessment of such a self-stabilizing transfer company, he is concerned with education issues and education policy in the face of obvious failure at school (see the PISA studies); he's finally long and wide to demographics, to demography, to demography, not only for reasons of affordability of pensions and the future expense of future generations - here he is with the population Herwig Birg completely d'accord - but especially so because this topic has been supplanted by the politics of the last 10 years and completely ignored, and it goes Sarrazin about the immigration policy, its parameters and effects, which then represents the problems with the integration of a sub-topic.
All these issues are currently burning and are as worthy to be discussed openly and publicly. That Sarrazin in support of his thesis repeatedly relies on certain branches of intelligence research, but remains his secret: It is not the best and strongest sections of his book, and he would have to really know. Only then, these by-line of his argument not been found by him facts (for they would have to be debated: does its factual basis?) And certainly not his lessons learned: They're as his expression really not only discussions worthy but and provocative enough to need discussion be!
It's just a shame that Sarrazin is shortened to Integratiosndebatte, even more so if it here only for his views on actionable intelligence research is heading. But this shortening of the debate to Sarrazin's book, "Germany creates off" for me is a sign that it probably only very few have actually read it all ...
Well: I HAVE READ IT! It's worth it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment